Subscribe for free
14Apr

Sorry but you’re not on the list…

1 comment so far

I’ve worked for more than 5 years with entertainment and being more specific with discos and clubs. I became what was and still is called a “PR”, a person that gives away “invites” to cool friends to populate the night. I earned a small percentage on every invite turned in with my name on it. In one year time I started to invest my money in club nights and quicker got more control over the event management.

Soon I was in charge of making the list (of people not paying to get in) and selecting people that got admitted into the event. That gave me a tremendous amount of power. I was soon able to ask the doormen to avoid certain people getting in.

For a pretty long period of time excluding others meant being at the top.

As Jedi Master of Marketing Seth Godin states:

“Credit card companies have made billions by selling a card that others can’t get.

Politicians stand up and talk about their (exclusive) religion, or pit one special interest group against another.

And of course, the best nightclubs have the biggest velvet ropes and the pickiest doormen.”

I had to think again

The Social Psychology of Inclusion and Exclusion, By Abrams, Hogg and Marques talks about the anger generated by exclusion. Violent reactions and discontent.

Soon few question popped up into my mind. How many people do we usually exclude from our events? How much discontent do we generate? Are there good reasons to exclude people?

At a club it’s up to the selector personal taste. Sometimes it is about the price. Few other times it is the content that excludes people.

Does inclusion mean populism?

What if the basis of events would be inclusion? BarCamp and unconferences are based on including people, but are not populist.

We tend to think that limited resources automatically mean exclusion.

The smart event planner thinks of ways to include those people e.g. who cannot make it that day, who cannot afford the price of the ticket, who are not familiar with the content.

Just think that:

- Online conferencing is a solution for those who cannot make it.

- Scholarships are a good method to make students attend an important conference and sponsors are willing to fund them.

- Opening an online forum and a blog about your event could help a lot of potential attendees to understand more about your content.

I am sure you can come up with more ideas and I invite you to do it.

Did you enjoy this post? Why not leave a comment below and continue the conversation, or subscribe to my feed and get articles like this delivered automatically to your feed reader.


Grab the Trackback URL


Related Posts


One Response to “Sorry but you’re not on the list…”

  1. Posted by Trade Show Help 15th April, 2008 at 10:01 pm

    I think that we all want what we can’t have right? so that’s why the proverbial VIP room is so convented. Good tips, I’ll try to work them in on some of my marketing efforts.

    Bruce

Leave a reply

  • Recent Comments

    • Thierry Curis: Julius, I agree those are the right Web 2.0 components to implement. What you suggest is exactly what...
    • david gandrud: I am leading the web 2.0 for my division. You provide a solid, basic overview….I will certainly...
    • Whitney Hoffman: I also have problems with the webcasting thing. To get a whole event like Podcamp online, requires...
    • Dr Wright: This is a really good post. No twitter account for the event can be good for everyone. Twitter has changed...
    • Laurent LaSalle: Well, I don’t agree that webcasting doesn’t add extra cost; it still requires time...
    • Kim: That great reading, thank you for sharing, Kim Kims last blog post..KVINDER OG MODE