What’s Ricardo Semler got to do with events
2 comments so far
Ricardo Semler has sparked a revolution for the theory of business management. He has actually put in practice what tons of authors have just theorized. He walked the walk and showed the world that horizontal management is indeed more effective than any other approach.
Events are about people. Pressure, limited time and resources push us to perform at 100% with no chance to fail. While reading Semler’s inspiring book ‘Maverick‘, I noted down few concepts which I am sure will question the way you tackle team management.
“In the lobby of our headquarters there is a reception desk, but no receptionist [...]. Everyone at Semco, even top managers, fetches guests, stand over photocopiers, send faxes, types letters, and dials the phone. We don’t believe in cluttering the payroll with ungratifying, dead end jobs.”
Most of the requests I receive through this blog are of people asking for how to get involved into events. The nature of the business requires hiring lots of temporary staff and that might be a good way to start getting involved.
Now, talking to managers, I ask you, do you hire to exploit and ‘clutter the payroll’ or do you hire to transfer knowledge?
Too many times I’ve seen and been treated as a “disposable” and “photocopier” employee. I think that hiring temps for events should have both a monetary and knowledge reward. The event manager along the way should share tips, inspire, suggest and help young and willing workers, full stop.
“I always smile when executives boast about how participative they are. ‘I want everyone to feel involved’ the say. ‘So I call everybody in, hear what’s on their minds, and only then decide’. What people call participative management is usually just consultative management”
I believe that the most manipulative, mind controlling technique to motivate people is to tell them how you care for their opinion. I’ve heard that statement multiple times but when I came up with my opinion it was completely ignored, not taken account of, plus I quickly figured out it was a way to keep me under control.
True empowerment and responsibility, on the other hand, made me feel like a thinking individual and actually deliver the best financial and non-financial results.
Therefore, if you do care about my opinion, I’d love to put that in practice.
“We don’t want to be a happy family. We want to be a successful business. We’re only concerned with our employees performance on their job, not their personal lives.”
The second most manipulative approach to managing people is to tell them that ‘we are members of the same family’. No thanks. I do have a family and I’d like to keep it out of the business environment.
I find invasive just the thought of a boss telling me that.
Not only should the manager be attentive in not embarking in such approach, but he/she should also guarantee that such behaviour does not occur horizontally among employees. Performance is indeed the most important factor, human touch and understanding is plausible but not a motivator or a business approach.
“At Semco we have stripped away the unnecessary perks and privileges, such as executive dining rooms and fancy office furniture, that feed the ego but hurt the balance sheet and distract everyone form the crucial corporate task of making, selling, billing and collecting.”
We all need to work a bit more on our egos, I’ll leave the rest of it for you to comment.
Thursday, April 3rd, 2008 at 12:51 pm and is filed under Event Planning 2.0, ideas, psychology of events, tips. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Did you enjoy this post? Why not leave a comment below and continue the conversation, or subscribe to my feed and get articles like this delivered automatically to your feed reader.
I do not follow the logic of as quoted, “We don’t believe in cluttering the payroll with ungratifying, dead end jobs.”
Firstly, he is insulting my former jobs as a secretary/assistant when in actuality they led me to my successful meeting planning career.
Secondly, these positions are invaluable to people like me who need to rely on someone to do the administrative tasks so I am freed up to negotiate contracts, go to site visits, manage logistics and conduct staff meetings. That said, nobody on my team has ever felt that faxing, answering the phone and making copies is ‘below’ them - we all just do what needs to be done.
As a planner, I have always felt my assistant was an extremely valuable part of my team, and when there was an opportunity to move up within the department the assistant usually got the first crack at the position.
Hi Travel Diva,
I definitely agree with you when you say that these positions are extrememly valuable to get involved into the business.
On the other hand, you have to agree that a lot of bosses keep an assistant in that position forever, not empowering or engaging him/her in any sort of activity.
I think that you definitely share with Semler the vision that assistants are”extremely valuable” and cannot be thought as photocopy machine substitutes. A lot of people do think like that.
Semler is obviously challenging the reader but what he is really trying to do is to defend the people abused from vertical management practices.
He has introduced forms of management such as the reverse performance review in which employees judge managers and not the other way around.
You also have to think that he has done that in Brazil and contextualize his statements in that particular country in the late ’80s. He has stood behind the workers to the point where he has been victim of threats and terrorist attacks to his home and family.
I deeply invite you to have a look at the book to fully understand his point as of course my post alone is not comprehensive.
Thanks for your comment and sharing your opinion.
Julius